PHI 210RS – Module 3 Case Analysis

Module 3 Case Analysis

Identify the moral issue(s) and the parties involved; discuss the case with respect to the principle of utility, taking care to identify the benefits and burdens that pertain to the parties affected.

This information is copied from the text book .“Thinking Critically About Ethical Issues” by Vincent Ryan Ruggiero   Evaluate the action in each of the following cases, applying what you learned in this chapter and explaining your reasoning carefully.  

  1. Claude challenges the principle of respect for persons with the following argument: “Past ages were simpler. Our grandparents knew personally the people they had contact with every day. Yet today the world has grown impersonal. We deal with telephone operators, airline personnel, cab drivers, people at the other end of computer lines. We don’t know them and they don’t know us. So the idea of respect for persons no longer holds.” Construct a reply to Claude’s argument.

 

  1. The science of genetic testing is fast reaching the point where it can be determined whether people carry genes for crippling, often fatal, diseases. Before long, employers may be able to know in advance whether job candidates are likely to need time off for illness; they can reject such candidates in advance. Further, health insurance companies may deny policies to such individuals. They may even refuse to reimburse parents for the delivery of a child known to be disabled before birth.

 

  1. A seventh-grade teacher divides his class into teams to research some history topics and report to the class. Each team consists of four students. One team presents a report that is excellent in substance. However, two members of the team behave childishly while making their contributions, so the overall presentation is flawed. The teacher lowers the team’s mark a full letter grade. Because the grade recorded for each team member is identical to the team grade, each member is penalized.

 

  1. A businessman is waiting for an elevator in his office building. A stranger motions him aside and whispers, “Wanna buy a fur coat for your wife? Two hundred dollars. No questions asked. What say?” He opens a large paper bag to reveal the coat. The businessman looks at it, touches it, and realizes that the coat is unquestionably mink and worth at least ten times what the man is asking for it. He takes out his wallet, hands over the $200, and takes the bag.

  Page 97

  1. A woman learns that her son-in-law fathered an illegitimate child several years before he met her daughter. (He and his wife have been happily married for ten years. They are childless.) She is sure her daughter is not aware of this and has reason to doubt that she would ever find out about it by herself. The woman feels obliged to tell her, however, and does so.

 

  1. A man and a woman, both college students, have been living together off campus for three years. They have never considered marrying, and it has always been implicit in their relationship that each should be free to leave the other any time he or she wishes. Unexpectedly, the woman becomes pregnant. Because she is opposed to abortion, she resigns herself to having the child. When she is seven months pregnant, the man decides to leave her. One day when she is out shopping for groceries, he gathers his belongings, scribbles a hasty note (“Our relationship was beautiful while it lasted, but it’s over”), and leaves.

 

  1. A businessman wishes to invest some money in wooded land. He knows that he can sell the trees for lumber, plant more trees, and sell them when they mature. He will be serving the cause of ecology at the same time he makes a modest income. After finding a parcel of land that is appropriate for his purposes, he asks the owner the selling price. The price is so ridiculously low that the man realizes the owner is unaware of the value of the trees as lumber. He ponders whether it is immoral to buy the land at such a price. He decides it is not and buys it.

PHI 210RS – Module 3 Case Analysis Rubric

Student Name:                                                                                                                              Date:                                                                                                                       

Rating Scale Exemplary: Corresponds to an A- to A (90-100%) Novice: Corresponds to D to D+ (60-69%)
  Proficient: Basic: Corresponds to B- to B+ (80-89%) Corresponds to C- to C+ (70-79%) Not Attempted: Corresponds to an F (0-59%)

  Students will complete the assignment with attention to the following criteria:  

      Elements   Criteria       Score
Not Attempted (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) Novice (does not meet expectations; performance is substandard) Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding)
  Analyzing case in terms of the principle of utility (identification of parties involved, benefits and burdens, and alternative possible actions or policies) 90% 0-53.99%   Paraphrases the information in the case without attempting an analysis or states opinions without attempting an analysis. Discusses irrelevant facts 54-62.99%   Attempts to provide an analysis of the case, but does not connect analysis to facts of the case. Is vague on three counts: identifying the parties involved, the benefits and burdens at stake, and the alternative possible actions or policies at stake 63-71.99% Attempts to provide an analysis of the case; connects analysis to facts of the case; is vague on two of the following: identifying the parties involved or the benefits and burdens at stake, or the alternative possible actions or policies at stake 72-80.99%   Attempts to provide an analysis of the case; connects analysis to facts of the case; is vague on one of the following: identifying the parties involved or the benefits and burdens at stake, or the alternative possible actions or policies at stake 81-90%   Provides a well-rounded analysis of the case; connects analysis to facts of the case; is successful in all three of the following: identifying the parties involved, the benefits and burdens at stake, and the alternative possible actions or policies at stake                 /90
  Mechanics of Writing 10% 0-5.99%   Little to no evidence of proper writing mechanics 6-6.99%   The grammar of the case analysis greatly impedes understanding of content 7-7.99%   The case analysis needs a good deal of improvement with respect to grammar, spelling, and/or style 8-8.99%   The case analysis is mostly free of errors with respect to grammar, spelling, and/or style, but needs some improvement 9-10%   The case analysis is nearly perfect with respect to grammar, spelling, and style               /10

  Total_______________________________________________________________________________ /100

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS – PHI 210RS – Module 3 Case Analysis

Who we are

We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help with your coursework.

Do you handle any type of coursework?

Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.

Is it hard to Place an Order?

  • 1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
  • 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – PHI 210RS – Module 3 Case Analysis

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. PHI 210RS – Module 3 Case Analysis

  • Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

  • Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. PHI 210RS – Module 3 Case Analysis

  • APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

  • Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

  • LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

  • Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

  • Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. PHI 210RS – Module 3 Case Analysis PHI 210RS – Module 3 Case Analysis

    SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS

    We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. PHI 210RS – Module 3 Case Analysis Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper