PSY FPX 8720 Assessment 5 Leadership Theories

Assessment 5 Leadership Theories

Name

Capella university

PSY FPX 8720 Psychology of Leadership

Prof. Name

Date

Introduction

Leadership theories abound, each offering insights into the intricacies of what makes a leader effective. These theories range from focusing on inherent traits to learned behaviors. Leadership is pivotal within any team dynamic. This paper delves into the case of Jordan, the director of Organizational Development, exploring his leadership journey amidst significant challenges and responsibilities. Jordan assumed his role approximately five years ago, a promotion that came with minimal prior experience. Despite this, he has dedicated himself to honing his skills, even obtaining certification as an ICF coach. Leading a team amid considerable turnover, Jordan spearheads critical initiatives, including cultural transformation and leadership development strategies. Despite concerns over resource allocation, he remains dedicated, though balancing his professional duties with parenthood poses its own challenges.

Servant Leadership

Robert Greenleaf’s Servant Leadership theory underscores the idea that effective leaders prioritize serving their followers. This approach emphasizes collaboration, trust, and empathy. Critics argue that overly focusing on followers’ needs may detract from organizational objectives. An anecdote involving Jordan during the pandemic illustrates how prioritizing individual needs can conflict with organizational requirements. Despite its potential drawbacks, such actions can foster trust and loyalty.

Fiedler’s Contingency Theory Leadership

Fred Fiedler’s Contingency Theory, developed in the 1960s, posits that leadership effectiveness hinges on situational factors rather than a universal style. This model delineates leadership style and situational control as key determinants of success. Fiedler’s Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) test discerns leaders’ orientations toward relationships or tasks. Jordan’s leadership style, assessed as High LPC, manifests in a preference for interpersonal connections over task orientation. This aligns with his engagement in relationship-focused tasks like leadership development but presents challenges in task-oriented projects such as implementing an ERP system.

Compare and Contrast

Servant Leadership shares commonalities with high LPC leadership but differs in its emphasis on continuous development and flexibility. Fiedler’s model, in contrast, posits a fixed leadership style contingent on situational factors. Both theories underscore the importance of aligning leadership approaches with contextual demands. In today’s increasingly virtual work landscape, leaders must adeptly navigate varying circumstances, blending servant-like support with directive clarity.

Servant Leadership in Action

Servant leadership excels in scenarios like onboarding and talent development, fostering employee empowerment and engagement. Conversely, Fiedler’s Contingency Theory underscores the importance of matching leaders with projects conducive to their natural inclinations. Jordan’s experiences exemplify the necessity of such alignment for project success.

Conclusion

Leadership is multifaceted, with no one-size-fits-all approach. Jordan’s journey highlights the need for adaptability and situational awareness in leadership. The theories explored offer valuable frameworks, emphasizing the dynamic interplay between leadership style and context. Ultimately, effective leadership requires a nuanced understanding of both individual inclinations and situational demands.

References

Burkus, D. (2021, October 4). Servant leadership theory. David Burkus. Retrieved December 16, 2021, from https://davidburkus.com/2010/04/servant-leadership-theory/ Mind Tools Content Team. (2021). Fiedler’s contingency model: Matching leadership style to a situation. Leadership Skills From MindTools.com. Retrieved December 16, 2021, from https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/fiedler.htm

PSY FPX 8720 Assessment 5 Leadership Theories

Tarallo, M. (2021, May 19). The art of servant leadership. SHRM. Retrieved December 17, 2021, from https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/organizational-andemployee-development/pages/the-art-of-servant-leadership.aspx Villanova University. (2021, September 9). The Contingency Theory of Leadership Explained. Villanovau.com. Retrieved December 16, 2021, from https://www.villanovau.com/resources/leadership/contingency-theory-leadership/

PSY FPX 8720 Assessment 5 Leadership Theories

Virtual leadership styles for remote businesses. Maryville Online. (2021, February 4). Retrieved December 17, 2021, from https://online.maryville.edu/blog/virtual-leadership/

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS – PSY FPX 8720 Assessment 5 Leadership Theories

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – PSY FPX 8720 Assessment 5 Leadership Theories

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

• Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

• Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

• APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

• Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

• LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. PSY FPX 8720 Assessment 5 Leadership Theories

• Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

• Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper