PSY FPX 5120 Assessment 4 Team Training Program to Minimize Group Thinking
Assessment 4 Team Training Program to Minimize Group Thinking
Name
Capella university
PSY FPX 5120 Social Psychology
Prof. Name
Date
Team Training Program to Mitigate Groupthink
Groupthink, a phenomenon where group members prioritize consensus over critical thinking to avoid conflict (Katopol, 2005), can hinder creativity and innovation within organizations. It fosters a culture of conformity, stifling diverse perspectives and inhibiting the exploration of alternative solutions (Levitan & Verhulst, 2015). To address this issue, a comprehensive team training program is proposed, drawing on various strategies to promote independent, creative, and innovative thinking within groups.Small Group Approach Brainstorming
Implementing a small group approach to brainstorming can mitigate the negative impact of group dynamics on creativity (McCauley, 1998). By dividing the team into smaller units, individuals are provided with a conducive environment to freely express their ideas without fear of judgment or pressure to conform. This approach not only encourages participation from all members but also facilitates the generation of a wider range of innovative solutions (McCauley, 1998).Absence of Team Leader
The absence of a dominant team leader during decision-making processes can help mitigate the influence of authority on individual opinions (Schöbel, Rieskamp, & Huber, 2016). While leaders play a vital role in providing organizational insights, their absence during brainstorming and idea evaluation sessions allows for unbiased exploration of ideas. This fosters a more democratic decision-making process, where all members feel empowered to contribute and challenge the status quo.Devil’s Advocate
Introducing the role of a devil’s advocate within the group encourages critical evaluation of ideas and fosters constructive debate (Sarver, 2013). By challenging prevailing assumptions and viewpoints, the devil’s advocate stimulates deeper analysis and encourages the consideration of alternative perspectives. This approach promotes a culture of intellectual honesty and rigorous decision-making, ultimately enhancing the quality of outcomes (Sarver et al., 2015).Conclusion
Minimizing groupthink in workplace decision-making is essential for fostering a culture of creativity and innovation. By implementing strategies such as small group brainstorming, absence of a dominant team leader, and the introduction of a devil’s advocate, organizations can encourage independent thinking and diverse perspectives, leading to more effective decision-making processes.PSY FPX 5120 Assessment 4 Team Training Program to Minimize Group Thinking
References
Katopol, P. F. (2005). An exploratory study of the information culture of city government support staff in relation to managerial decision-making. Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812701527_0070 Levitan, L. C., & Verhulst, B. (2015). Conformity in groups: The effects of others’ views on expressed attitudes and Attitude Change. Political Behavior, 38(2), 277–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9312-x McCauley, C. (1998). Group Dynamics in Janis’s theory of Groupthink: Backward and forward. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73(2-3), 142–162. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2759PSY FPX 5120 Assessment 4 Team Training Program to Minimize Group Thinking
Sarver, C. C. (2013). Countering groupthink: The inner-circle of influence (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. (UMI Number: 3595837) Schöbel, M., Rieskamp, J., & Huber, R. (2016). Social influences in Sequential Decision making. PLOS ONE, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146536 Whyte, G. (1998). Recasting Janis’s groupthink model: The key role of collective efficacy in decision fiascoes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73(2-3), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2761PSY FPX 5120 Assessment 4 Team Training Program to Minimize Group Thinking
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS – PSY FPX 5120 Assessment 4 Team Training Program to Minimize Group Thinking
Who we are
We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help with your coursework.Do you handle any type of coursework?
Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.Is it hard to Place an Order?
- 1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
- 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
- 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
- 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
- 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.
SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – PSY FPX 5120 Assessment 4 Team Training Program to Minimize Group Thinking
We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.- Discussion Questions (DQ)
Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
- Weekly Participation
Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. PSY FPX 5120 Assessment 4 Team Training Program to Minimize Group Thinking
- APA Format and Writing Quality
Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
- Use of Direct Quotes
I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
- LopesWrite Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
PSY FPX 5120 Assessment 4 Team Training Program to Minimize Group Thinking
- Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. PSY FPX 5120 Assessment 4 Team Training Program to Minimize Group Thinking
- Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
