PSY FPX 8841 Assessment 4 Team Performance Enhancement Plan

Assessment 4 Team Performance Enhancement Plan

Name

Capella university

PSY FPX 8841 Performance Enhancement in Sports

Prof. Name

Date

Enhancing Team Performance Strategy

The ensuing document presents the Team Performance Enhancement Strategy devised by Coach Rebekah Woodson for a Collegiate Level Co-Ed Cheerleading squad, with a specific emphasis on Track IV. This enhancement plan aims to foster improved team dynamics in anticipation of the team’s inaugural competition (APA Division 47, 2011). The strategy will delineate pivotal factors influencing the team’s performance, alongside intervention tactics to mitigate hindrances and bolster behaviors conducive to superior performance.

Identifying Performance Challenges

Coach Becky has articulated concerns regarding her athletes’ dwindling motivation and the lack of cohesion among teammates. This marks her maiden coaching stint with this team, which diverges from her previous coaching experiences. Notably, the university is a Historically Black College and University (HBCU), while Coach Becky, hailing from the UK, is a Caucasian woman. Her coaching background primarily comprises competitive teams, with limited exposure to both game day-style and competitive seasons. Several athletes question her qualifications to lead the team, exacerbating the existing motivational deficit. Coach Becky reports a pervasive lack of drive among her athletes, impeding their readiness for the competition season. Motivation, as defined by Bull and Sham (1996), encompasses both external stimuli and internal mechanisms that evoke and direct behavior. It manifests in two forms: extrinsic, driven by external rewards like accolades or monetary incentives, and intrinsic, stemming from within the athlete (Seipp, 1991). Additionally, Coach Becky has observed a palpable lack of cohesion between veteran members and rookies. Veterans adopt a more stringent approach towards rookies during the learning process, employing initiation tactics that exacerbate the divide. Cohesion, as delineated by Carron, Brawley, and Widmeyer (1998), epitomizes a dynamic process wherein a group coalesces and remains united in pursuit of shared goals.

Strategies for Performance Enhancement

Addressing Anxiety: Anxiety, an emotional state conducive to envisioning negative outcomes, poses a formidable obstacle, particularly for first-time competition participants. Fear can serve as a potent motivator, as advocated by Beckmann and Elbe (2014). Encouraging athletes to pinpoint instances of tangible failure facilitates the transformation of anxiety into constructive fear, propelling them to hone their skills and mitigate potential shortcomings. Fostering Cohesion: To cultivate a more cohesive team dynamic, implementing a mentor-mentee system between veterans and rookies emerges as a prudent approach. Pairing athletes based on commonalities such as academic majors or geographic proximity facilitates rapport-building. Research by Montoya, Horton, and Kirchner (2008) underscores the significance of perceived similarity in fostering interpersonal connections. Additionally, increasing the duration of interaction among teammates, as suggested by Eys et al. (2015), augments cohesion.

Implementation and Integration

Integration into Practice: The anxiety-to-fear intervention and mentor-mentee sessions should be seamlessly integrated into practice schedules. This facilitates direct application of learned techniques within the sporting context, thereby reinforcing their efficacy. Coach Becky’s active participation in these sessions reinforces her commitment to the team’s development and fosters mutual respect.

Ethical Considerations and Mental Health

Given the co-ed nature of the team, ethical considerations pertaining to equitable treatment of athletes warrant meticulous attention. The American Psychological Association’s guidelines (2017) caution against unfair discrimination, emphasizing the importance of fostering an inclusive environment. Moreover, vigilance regarding athletes’ mental health is imperative, with proactive referrals to mental health professionals warranted if issues arise.

Feedback and Revisions

Coach Becky’s feedback underscores the significance of fostering interpersonal connections within the team. Addressing her concerns, the strategy prioritizes integration of interventions into practice schedules, ensuring maximal efficacy and relevance. This approach not only enhances performance but also nurtures a sense of camaraderie among team members.

References

American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/ APA Division 47. (2011). Graduate training and career possibilities in exercise and sport psychology. Retrieved from https://www.apadivisions.org/division-47/about/resources/training Association of Applied Sport Psychology. (2011). ETHICS CODE: AASP Ethical Principles and Standards | Association for Applied Sport Psychology. Retrieved from https://appliedsportpsych.org/about/ethics/ethics-code/

PSY FPX 8841 Assessment 4 Team Performance Enhancement Plan

Beckmann, J., & Elbe, A. (2014). Sport psychological interventions in competitive sports. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Bull, A., & Sham, B. (1996). The mental game plan. Eastbourne, United Kingdom: Sports Dynamics. Capella University. (n.d.). Tracks and Opportunities in Sport Psychology. Retrieved from http://media.capella.edu/CourseMedia/PSY8841/FlashCards_1/psy8841_career_61.asp Carron, A. V., Brawley, L. R., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1998). The measurement of cohesiveness in sport groups. In J. L. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 213–226). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology. Eys, M., Evans, M. B., Martin, L. J., Ohlert, J., Wolf, S. A., Van Bussel, M., & Steins, C. (2015). Cohesion and performance for female and male sport teams. The Sport Psychologist, 29(2), 97–109. Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25(6), 889–922. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407508096700

PSY FPX 8841 Assessment 4 Team Performance Enhancement Plan

Seipp, B. (1991). Anxiety and academic performance: A meta-analysis of findings. Anxiety Research, 4(1), 27-41.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS – PSY FPX 8841 Assessment 4 Team Performance Enhancement Plan

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – PSY FPX 8841 Assessment 4 Team Performance Enhancement Plan

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

• Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

• Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

• APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

• Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. PSY FPX 8841 Assessment 4 Team Performance Enhancement Plan

• LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

• Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

• Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.  PSY FPX 8841 Assessment 4 Team Performance Enhancement Plan

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper