NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 3 Course Evaluation Template

Assessment 3 Course Evaluation

Student Name

Capella University

NURS-FPX 6111 Assessment and Evaluation in Nursing Education

Prof. Name

Date

Part one – Standardized Course Evaluation Template

In the constantly evolving world of education, feedback plays a pivotal role in shaping course content and delivery methodologies. At [University Name], we consider our students key stakeholders in teaching-learning. Your insights help us understand what is working and where there is room for improvement. This evaluation form, therefore, not only reflects our commitment to continuous enhancement but also underscores our belief in a collaborative educational environment. We assure you of the anonymity of your responses and deeply value your time and honesty.

Evaluation of the Course “Clinical Healthcare Ethics for Pediatric Nurses”

Course Objectives – The course’s primary aim is to ensure you:	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
Understand and adeptly apply the fundamental ethical principles in pediatric nursing.
Exhibit practical skills in navigating and resolving ethical dilemmas.
Delve deeply into the emotional and moral undertones of decisions within pediatric nursing.
Work synergistically in a team environment, embodying leadership in ethical decision-making.
Your comments regarding course objectives:

NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 3 Course Evaluation Template

Learning Outcomes – The course is structured to provide you with skills in the following domains:	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
Theoretical understanding and cognitive grasp of pediatric ethical principles.
Hands-on application of these principles in practical scenarios.
Nurturing emotional intelligence and fostering a profound reflection on ethical decision-making.
Your comments on learning outcomes:

Teaching Approaches – Rate the instructor based on the following:	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
Their expertise and clarity in presenting ethical principles.
Efficient utilization of teaching aids and instructional tools.
Frequency and quality of feedback on assignments.
Promoting class discussions and active student participation.
Your comments on teaching approaches:

NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 3 Course Evaluation Template

Program Outcome – Reflect on the following course components:	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
The relevance and comprehensiveness of course literature and supplemental reading materials.
The realism and efficacy of class simulations and practical scenarios.
The value of peer interactions and structured group activities.
Your comments on program outcomes:

Evidence to Support Assessment Strategies

The development of our template was rooted in multiple evidence-based strategies. Drawing from academic literature, studies have continuously emphasized the necessity of encapsulating all three learning domains—cognitive, psychomotor, and affective—in evaluations, which our template ardently reflects (Agustian, 2022; Lo & Yang, 2022). This theoretical foundation was enriched by the invaluable feedback from educators and students, ensuring the template’s practical relevance. A thorough benchmarking process, where we analyzed templates from esteemed educational institutions, allowed us to recognize and incorporate the most effective assessment strategies. Lastly, our commitment to perfection saw the template being pilot-tested with a select group, ensuring its precision through iterative refinements based on direct feedback.

Part Two – Executive Summary

A dependable academic program’s foundation hinges on its evaluative methods’ accuracy. Recognizing this, we have crafted a standardized course evaluation template, which meticulously spans the three integral learning domains: cognitive, psychomotor, and affective. The inclusion of these three domains in our template is not arbitrary. Scholarly evidence suggests that these domains are paramount in grasping the complexity of the educational experience (Smith & (Agustian, 2022; Lo & Yang, 2022). For instance, the cognitive domain revolves around the understanding and acquisition of knowledge. The psychomotor domain pertains to the development and execution of skills. Lastly, the affective domain gauges the depth of student engagement, attitudes, and values concerning the course. These domains are a barometer of a student’s holistic educational journey. Integral to our template’s foundation is the underlying assumptions that holistic student experiences can be quantified and that a mixed-method approach captures a fuller, more comprehensive view of learning outcomes. Our template’s format that is used to assess learning and program outcomes is a mixed-method strategy, which revolves around research, quantitative, and qualitative assessment. Grounded in research, such a strategy ensures both breadth and depth in feedback collection. Quantitative metrics, in the form of Likert scales, offer standardized, measurable insights into student perceptions (Kondakci et al., 2022). On the other hand, qualitative inquiries, achieved through open-ended questions, unearth detailed narratives of student experiences (Wilson et al., 2023). This blend ensures that while we get a pulse on general sentiments, we are also attuned to the nuances that might not be captured through structured questions alone.

NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 3 Course Evaluation Template

Criteria for evaluating this strategy include its capacity for comprehensive feedback, alignment with learning outcomes, and adaptability to diverse educational settings. Reliability and validity form the pillars of any evaluation mechanism. Our template shines in this regard. We have undertaken rigorous steps to ensure that our questions maintain a high standard of content validity, aligning closely with course objectives. We underscore the criterion validity by mapping our feedback mechanism to specific learning outcomes. Furthermore, our methods provide a predictive lens, giving educators a foresight into potential academic outcomes based on the received feedback. This reliability stems from the template’s standardization, assuring consistent feedback regardless of when or by whom the evaluation is conducted (Varghese & Timmons, 2022). Despite its strengths, our evaluation methodology recognizes its imperfections. The nature of open-ended responses means personal sentiments can sometimes sway them. Moreover, our wide-ranging questions, aiming to capture the more extensive educational experience, might occasionally miss the nuances of specific course modules, as highlighted by Mello (2022). However, here is the silver lining: recognizing these shortcomings is our first step toward excellence. By acknowledging these gaps, we are being transparent and sending a clear message of our unwavering dedication to improvement. Embracing these challenges inspires us to work even harder, ensuring our evaluation tool is continually refined, becoming more accurate and valuable with each iteration. In conclusion, Our evaluation template is not a static entity but a dynamic tool. It is deeply rooted in academic research, pedagogical best practices, and the pragmatic needs of educators and learners. Its design promotes actionable insights, yet its utility is contingent on continuous updates and alignments, ensuring it remains a gold standard in course evaluations.

References

Agustian, H. Y. (2022). Considering the hexad of learning domains in the laboratory to address the overlooked aspects of chemistry education and fragmentary approach to the assessment of student learning. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 23(3), 518–530. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RP00271F Kondakci, Y., Zayim Kurtay, M., Kaya Kasikci, S., & Önen, Ö. (2022). Graduate student perceptions of preparedness for responsible conduct of research: A mixed methods study. Ethics & Behavior, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2022.2149524 Lo, K.-W., & Yang, B.-H. (2022). Development and learning efficacy of a simulation rubric in childhood pneumonia for nursing students: A mixed methods study. Nurse Education Today, 119, 105544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105544

NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 3 Course Evaluation Template

Mello, R. F., Neto, R., Fiorentino, G., Alves, G., Verenna Arêdes, Galdino, V., Taciana Pontual Falcão, & Dragan Gašević. (2022). Enhancing instructors’ capability to assess open-response using natural language processing and learning analytics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16290-9_8 Varghese, D., & Timmons, D. (2022). Establishing and reporting content validity evidence of periodic, objective treatment review and nursing evaluation. Nursing Communications, 6(0), e2022022. https://doi.org/10.53388/in2022022 Wilson, S. T., Urban, R. W., & Smith, J. G. (2023). Online prelicensure nursing students’ experiences of academic incivility during COVID ‐19: A qualitative inquiry. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15656

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS – NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 3 Course Evaluation Template

Who we are

We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help with your coursework.

Do you handle any type of coursework?

Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.

Is it hard to Place an Order?

1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 3 Course Evaluation Template

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 3 Course Evaluation Template

LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 3 Course Evaluation Template

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 3 Course Evaluation Template

NURS-FPX 6111 Assessment and Evaluation in Nursing Education

Part one – Standardized Course Evaluation Template

Evaluation of the Course “Clinical Healthcare Ethics for Pediatric Nurses”

Course Objectives – The course’s primary aim is to ensure you:

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Understand and adeptly apply the fundamental ethical principles in pediatric nursing.

Exhibit practical skills in navigating and resolving ethical dilemmas.

Delve deeply into the emotional and moral undertones of decisions within pediatric nursing.

Work synergistically in a team environment, embodying leadership in ethical decision-making.