NURS FPX 5005 Assessment 2 Quantitative and Qualitative Research Publication Critique

Assessment 2 Quantitative and Qualitative Research Publication Critique

Student Name

Capella University

NURS-FPX 5005 Introduction to Nursing Research, Ethics, and Technology

Prof. Name

Date

Quantitative and Qualitative Research Publication Critique

The analysis of quantitative and qualitative research delves into an in-depth examination and evaluation of each methodology. Qualitative research focuses on a detailed exploration and assessment of new ideas and experiences concerning research methods, while quantitative research is more concerned with measuring variables and testing hypotheses. This critique assesses the strengths and weaknesses of a quantitative research study and its ethical implications, while also examining the significance of both qualitative and quantitative research for the research problem of falls among older patients and their implications for patient care decision-making.

Strengths and Weaknesses of the Quantitative Research Study

Title: The Impact of Activity Mediation on Diminishing the Fall Hazard in More seasoned Grown-ups: A Meta-Examination of Randomized Controlled Preliminaries For the quantitative research study, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is selected as the quantitative method. This article examines the effects of an exercise intervention on reducing falls among older adults, employing a comprehensive meta-analysis approach. Falls are a significant concern for individuals aged over 65, as they can lead to physical injuries, disabilities, and even death, with associated economic burdens. This study emphasizes the urgent need to address this issue among older adults due to its severe consequences. The study utilized randomized controlled trials related to exercise interventions for older patients, and the data evaluation followed the Cochrane Collaboration Convention guidelines. It encompasses various aspects of exercise interventions, such as type, duration, and frequency. The authors employed a rigorous research methodology, including searching reputable databases for data collection. Additionally, they used the Pedro scale, a quality assessment tool with a maximum score of 10, to assess the quality of the included articles. Data analysis was conducted using appropriate statistical software, specifically Revman, to calculate the Normalized Mean Difference. With a sample size of 648 subjects, the study’s conclusions can be considered robust, demonstrating a strength of the research.

NURS FPX 5005 Assessment 2 Quantitative and Qualitative Research Publication Critique

In summary, the study’s strength lies in providing robust evidence to support the effectiveness of exercise interventions in reducing patient falls among older adults. Its strengths include its comprehensive scope, rigorous methodology based on meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, clear findings indicating the positive effects of the intervention, and practical implications regarding exercise frequency and intensity. However, there are some weaknesses to consider. The trials may not capture the complete picture of the intervention’s effects on falls among older patients. Additionally, the study does not account for comorbidities, economic circumstances, and readiness of older individuals, which could potentially influence the results. Furthermore, reliance on self-reported data in the review introduces some doubt regarding the conclusions. To improve the research, a comparison of the proposed intervention with other fall prevention strategies for older adults could have been included.

Ethical Implications

Ethical considerations are paramount in healthcare research to ensure the rights, safety, and well-being of participants. These considerations encompass elements such as protection from excessive risks, informed consent, and respect for autonomy. Ethical considerations also contribute to the quality and credibility of research, instilling public trust in healthcare practices (Bhandari, 2021). In this critique, informed consent is not applicable, as the research is based on the analysis of existing articles. However, ethical implications can be related to ensuring equitable access to safe interventions for reducing fall risks among older adults. The Belmont principles play a crucial role in ethical standards, emphasizing respect for individuals, beneficence, and justice (Parker et al., 2019).

NURS FPX 5005 Assessment 2 Quantitative and Qualitative Research Publication Critique

According to the Belmont principle of respect, each individual should be treated as an autonomous agent, ensuring equal protection. The principle of beneficence seeks to promote the well-being of all individuals without causing harm. The principle of justice ensures fairness in the distribution of resources and services to individuals based on their unique needs and efforts. All research included in this critique focuses on safe exercise interventions, ensuring participant safety. Additionally, the interventions used in the research should align with the participants’ needs and physical capabilities. Notably, the research primarily involves healthy participants, with no reference to those with underlying health issues.

Significance of the Research Problem

The quantitative research addresses the issue of falls among older patients, a problem of significant importance due to its severe impact on patients’ health and the economy. Falls among the elderly can result in serious injuries, disabilities, or even death. They can lead to reduced mobility and independence, causing a decline in the quality of life (Vaishya & Vaish, 2020). Falls can also contribute to mental distress in older individuals, in addition to physical harm. Approximately 30% of individuals over the age of 65 experience falls annually, with estimated healthcare costs of nearly $50 billion per year (Florence et al., 2018). Therefore, addressing this issue through various interventions is critical.

Evaluation of Quantitative Study

Quantitative research provides valuable data to inform decisions related to older patients. The research demonstrates the effectiveness of exercise interventions for older patients. Healthcare providers can incorporate exercise-based interventions into their care protocols to reduce fall risks among older adults. This research offers evidence-based practices that can be integrated into healthcare policies. Additionally, it suggests further research to explore the intervention’s effectiveness in various economic contexts. Utilizing this research as an evidence-based practice can enhance the quality of life for older patients and prevent physical and mental harm associated with falls. However, the study could be improved by comparing the proposed intervention with other fall prevention strategies and including patient perspectives and economic factors.

Strengths and Weaknesses of the Qualitative Research Study

Title: Put it to work, or it will quit working for you: A Subjective Investigation of The Support of Active work in More established Grown-ups The qualitative research study focuses on the lack of physical activity among older adults, a global concern. The article highlights the importance of physical activity and its potential to enhance quality of life. It provides valuable insights into maintaining physical activity behavior among older adults. The study employs a qualitative approach to explore factors contributing to physical activity behavior and maintenance among older adults. Researchers used a thematic analysis approach, and data interpretation was conducted by two research coders. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with older adults who participated in trial groups or had experience with home-based exercises. The study offers a comprehensive overview of physical activity levels among older adults. The interviews conducted at participants’ homes provided insights into activity levels during the intervention (e.g., group exercise or home-based exercise). The study also explores health benefits, facilitators, barriers, and the use of technology in maintaining physical activity. An additional strength is that interview transcripts were analyzed without altering the wording, and analysis was conducted using NVivo10.

NURS FPX 5005 Assessment 2 Quantitative and Qualitative Research Publication Critique

The study covers a wide range of aspects, including benefits (both physical and mental), barriers, facilitators (social and environmental), social interaction, and more. It also addresses the use of technology for motivation and support of physical activity, even though this aspect was not initially part of the interventions. The use of framework analysis helped interpret participants’ statements. Researchers and practitioners can benefit from this research as it provides a comprehensive understanding of the subject. However, there are some weaknesses in the study. For instance, the size of the focus group was small, making it challenging to generalize the results. The data were collected exclusively from a specific region of the United Kingdom, which raises questions about the applicability of the intervention in other regions or countries. Additionally, the study does not explore the effects of economic status and access to resources on the maintenance of physical activity. Finally, the inclusion some quantitative data could have strengthened the research by providing more tangible evidence.

Ethical Implications

The research study received ethical approval from the Public Research Ethics Governance Panel South East Coast, and written informed consent was obtained from participants before conducting interviews. Participants were informed of their right to withdraw from the study at any time, and they were advised that data collected up to their withdrawal would be used with their consent. The study also ensured that participants did not experience distress during the research. Notably, the study involved English-speaking adults, which eliminates ethical concerns related to individuals from other language backgrounds.

Significance of the Research Problem

The qualitative research study addresses the issue of physical inactivity, which is a significant concern globally. Physical activity is essential for keeping older individuals physically and mentally active, reducing the risk of chronic diseases (Cunningham & O’Sullivan, 2020). It can lower the risk of conditions such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, falls, dementia, disability, and depression (Cunningham et al., 2020). Additionally, physical activity can enhance strength and balance, leading to an overall improvement in the quality of life for older adults (Langhammer et al., 2018). However, the research could have been further enhanced by including economic impacts and access to resources, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the significance of physical activity.

Conclusion

Quantitative and qualitative research analysis plays a vital role in the comprehensive examination and evaluation of research problems using various data analysis methods. Quantitative research can inform decisions related to older patients, as it demonstrates the effectiveness of exercise interventions. Subjective research information from qualitative studies can be applied in practice and decision-making processes. In this critique, the strengths and weaknesses of both quantitative and qualitative research studies were analyzed, along with their ethical implications. These analyses shed light on the significance of employing diverse approaches to address the issue of falls among older patients and their implications for patient care decision-making.
References
Bhandari, P. (2021). A guide to ethical considerations in research. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/research-ethics/ Cunningham, C., & O’Sullivan, R. (2020). Why physical activity matters for older adults in a time of pandemic. European Review of Aging and Physical Activity, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-020-00249-3 Cunningham, C., O’Sullivan, R., Caserotti, P., & Tully, M. A. (2020). Consequences of physical inactivity in older adults: A systematic review of reviews and meta-analyses. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 30(5), 816–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13616
NURS FPX 5005 Assessment 2 Quantitative and Qualitative Research Publication Critique
Florence, C. S., Bergen, G., Atherly, A., Burns, E., Stevens, J., & Drake, C. (2018). Medical costs of fatal and nonfatal falls in older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 66(4), 693–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15304 Langhammer, B., Bergland, A., & Rydwik, E. (2018). The importance of physical activity exercise among older people. BioMed Research International, 2018(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7856823 Parker, M., Pearson, C., Donald, C., & Fisher, C. B. (2019). Beyond the Belmont Principles: A community‐based approach to developing an indigenous ethics model and curriculum for training health researchers working with American Indian and Alaska native communities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 64(1-2), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12360 Vaishya, R., & Vaish, A. (2020). Falls in older adults are serious. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 54(1), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-019-00037-x

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS – NURS FPX 5005 Assessment 2 Quantitative and Qualitative Research Publication Critique

Who we are

We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help with your coursework.

Do you handle any type of coursework?

Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.

Is it hard to Place an Order?

  • 1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
  • 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – NURS FPX 5005 Assessment 2 Quantitative and Qualitative Research Publication Critique

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.
  • Discussion Questions (DQ)
Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
  • Weekly Participation
Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
  • APA Format and Writing Quality
Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
  • Use of Direct Quotes
I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. NURS FPX 5005 Assessment 2 Quantitative and Qualitative Research Publication Critique
  • LopesWrite Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
  • Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
  • Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. NURS FPX 5005 Assessment 2 Quantitative and Qualitative Research Publication Critique

    SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS

    We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper