PSY FPX 6820 Assessment 2 Analyzing TAIS Results

Assessment 2 Analyzing TAIS Results

Name

Capella university

PSY FPX 6820 Performance Enhancement in Sports

Prof. Name

Date

Analyzing TAIS Results

Andrew’s potential as a team leader and quarterback positions him as a promising draft pick. His TAIS scores indicate strengths in categories such as external and internal distractibility, orientation toward rules and risk, self-criticism, decision-making style, and expression of criticism and anger. However, he falls below World Champ percentiles in information processing, control, physically competitive, and expression of support and affection. The remaining categories place him between percentiles.

TAIS & Athletics

The TAIS serves as a tool to distinguish performance enhancement needs and the requirement for alternative psychological services. It assesses communication and concentration skills aimed at enhancing performance. Its multidimensional design focuses on attentional and interpersonal styles crucial for high-level athletes like Andrew, who face increasing pressure. The tool considers gender differences in attentional focus and expression of affect. Additionally, occupation influences the measured skills, as observed in comparisons between white male college students and police officers. Andrew’s scores, particularly in distractibility, align with existing research.

Strengths and Weaknesses

Higher distractibility scores may lead to anxiety and performance weaknesses if overload occurs. Conversely, individuals with higher distractibility may integrate ideas better, enhancing analytical capabilities. These strengths and weaknesses are crucial for understanding an athlete’s performance potential.

Priorities of Performance

Competitive factors affect attention styles, emphasizing the importance of analyzing and integrating multiple ideas for optimal performance. Andrew’s ability to maintain focus despite external distractions is vital for overcoming environmental challenges during gameplay.

Analysis Recommendation

Andrew’s TAIS results highlight areas for improvement, particularly in maintaining focus and managing self-criticism. While his decision-making skills and orientation toward risk-taking are strengths, his low expression of affection suggests a preference for negative reinforcement environments. Understanding these nuances can aid in tailoring training and support strategies to maximize Andrew’s potential.

Conclusion

Andrew demonstrates significant potential despite identified areas for development. With tailored techniques and training, he can overcome challenges and excel as a draft pick. A deeper understanding of his individual traits beyond TAIS results can further support his recommendation.

References

EPSystems. (1974). Tais sales report sample – sullivan search. The Attentional & Interpersonal Style Inventory.https://sullivansearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/TAIS-Sales-Report-Sample.pdf. Nideffer, R. M. (1976). Test of attentional and interpersonal style. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(3), 394-404.

PSY FPX 6820 Assessment 2 Analyzing TAIS Results

Nideffer, R. M. (1990). Use of the Test of Attentional and Interpersonal Style (TAIS) in sport. Human Kinetics Journals. https://journals-humankinetics-com.library.capella.edu/doi/pdf/10.1123/tsp.4.3.285 TAIS Inventory. (February 3rd, 2022.). Measuring the Building Blocks of Performance. TAIS. http://www.taisinventory.com/category/articles/

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS – PSY FPX 6820 Assessment 2 Analyzing TAIS Results

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – PSY FPX 6820 Assessment 2 Analyzing TAIS Results

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

• Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

• Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

• APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

• Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. PSY FPX 6820 Assessment 2 Analyzing TAIS Results

• LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

• Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

• Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. PSY FPX 6820 Assessment 2 Analyzing TAIS Results

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper