PSY FPX 8841 Assessment 2 Analyzing TAIS Results

Assessment 2 Analyzing TAIS

Name

Capella university

PSY FPX 8841 Performance Enhancement in Sports

Prof. Name

Date

Analyzing Athlete Selection Through TAIS Results

Professional sports teams invest significant resources in scouting and selecting athletes who fit their team dynamics. Various tools are utilized to assess athletes’ mental, physical, and emotional attributes, providing comparative data for further evaluation. This paper examines the findings of a TAIS Inventory report on an athlete under consideration for drafting by team leadership. It delves into specific subcategories of the report, including awareness, distractibility, and self-recognition, comparing test levels against world champion standards and providing insights into the results.

The TAIS Inventory

The Attentional and Interpersonal Style (TAIS) Inventory is a comprehensive self-report questionnaire comprising 144 elements, measuring 20 concentration skills and personal attributes (Nideffer, 1990). This assessment tool allows researchers and sports analysts to gain insights into athletes’ psychological profiles, offering glimpses into their potential for elite or champion-level performance. While some critics question its theoretical foundation, research suggests a significant correlation between cognitive processes, emotional arousal, and competitive performance (Nideffer, 1990).

PSY FPX 8841 Assessment 2 Analyzing TAIS Results

The TAIS evaluates distractibility and awareness, crucial factors affecting professional and elite athletes (Vealy et al., 2017). It assesses internal and external distractibility, gauging susceptibility to internal emotional distractions and external interruptions. Additionally, awareness measures an individual’s perceptiveness to non-verbal emotional cues and their attention to detail within their sporting environment. Other components include expression, introversion/extroversion, and analytical attention, aiding in identifying well-rounded candidates for sports teams.

Analyzing Athlete’s Results

Andrew Athlete’s TAIS Inventory scores are presented as percentiles compared to a standard group norm and world champion athletes. Notably, his self-confidence score is low at 23%, while his self-critical score is exceptionally high at 98%. Such extremes are detrimental to an athlete’s performance, falling well below the average norm and the World Champion Range (WCR). Andrew’s high levels of internal and external distractibility, both exceeding the WCR by over 30%, raise concerns for potential teams. These distractibility issues align with his confidence and self-criticism challenges, indicating significant hurdles for athletic success. Furthermore, Andrew’s physical competitiveness score of 39% falls below the average norm and the WCR’s competitive range of 61%. Coupled with his high expression of criticism and anger (94%), observers may anticipate aggressive reactions to feedback. However, his balanced introversion (44%) and extroversion (54%) suggest potential for learning and skill development without appearing overbearing.

Conclusion

While Andrew Athlete exhibits competitive skills and a likable personality, his TAIS Inventory results suggest he may not be ready for professional athletics. Gaps in critical-thinking skills, incongruent with his intellectual capacity, and coping mechanisms raise doubts about his readiness for elite competition.

References

Jago, A., & Pain, M. (1998). Creating interventions for athletes based on TAIS and PDS scores. Journal of Sports Psychology, 25(3), 30-39. Nideffer, R.M. (1990). Use of the test of attentional and interpersonal style (TAIS) in sport. The Sport Psychologist, 4(3), 285-300. Nideffer, R. (2007). The attention and interpersonal style (TAIS) inventory. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems, Inc.

PSY FPX 8841 Assessment 2 Analyzing TAIS Results

Vallerand, R. (2003). Attention and decision making: A test of the predictive validity of the test of attention and interpersonal style (TAIS) in a sports setting. Journal of Sports and Exercise Psychology, 5(4), 449-459. Vealy, R., Cooley, R., Nilsson, E., Block, C., & Galli, N. (2017). [Title of the article]. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), Page Range.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS – PSY FPX 8841 Assessment 2 Analyzing TAIS Results

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – PSY FPX 8841 Assessment 2 Analyzing TAIS Results

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

• Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

• Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

• APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

• Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. PSY FPX 8841 Assessment 2 Analyzing TAIS Results

• LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

• Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

• Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. PSY FPX 8841 Assessment 2 Analyzing TAIS Results

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper