PSY FPX 5120 Assessment 1 Participating in Politics: Executive Summary

Assessment 1 Participating in Politics: Executive Summary

Name

Capella university

PSY FPX 5120 Social Psychology

Prof. Name

Date

Executive Summary

Proposal Name: Enhancing Voting Integrity Proposal Author: Madison Ovitt Proposal Client: John Doe, Town Hall President Proposal Stakeholders: All voters Proposal Due Date: June 14th, 2022

Objectives:

Upholding the integrity of voting, as a fundamental human right, demands shielding it from undue external influences. This proposal aims to establish voting guidelines, minimizing the sway of social and mainstream media, thereby fostering autonomous decision-making among voters (Ovitt, 2022). Research indicates that media and social influences significantly impact political self-expression (Bond et al., 2012). Hence, the proposal seeks to mitigate these influences, ensuring voters make choices devoid of undue external pressures.

Proposed Solution:

The proposal suggests assembling a dedicated team to provide unbiased, factual information on candidates or issues. This team will curate and filter media content, aiming to elevate the integrity of votes by minimizing biased influences. Accountability measures, akin to those implemented in Germany, will hold sponsors and advertisers responsible for fair representation (Krause, 2015).

Final Deliverable:

The final proposal entails establishing stringent guidelines to govern media and social representations during voting and public debates. It advocates for maintaining impartiality and refraining from influencing others’ decisions, ensuring fair and ethical practices (Ovitt, 2022). Similar initiatives have proven effective in other nations and are crucial for fostering informed decision-making.

Risks:

Several challenges may impede the effectiveness of the proposed measures, including the persistence of social influences despite media filtering and the potential for personal biases among those filtering content. Additionally, enforcing consequences for biased representations may pose logistical difficulties (Ovitt, 2022).

Project Budget/Spending Estimate:

While a precise budget is yet to be determined, allocating resources for the team responsible for media filtering is imperative for safeguarding voting integrity. Further assessment will refine the budgetary requirements as the proposal progresses (Ovitt, 2022).

Proposal Priorities:

The foremost priorities include facilitating fair and unbiased voting practices, ensuring equal opportunities for all voters, and discouraging unethical influence tactics (Ovitt, 2022).

Proposed Guidelines:

Establishing research-backed guidelines is paramount for fostering ethical public debates and media coverage during elections. These guidelines aim to eliminate misinformation and promote factual discourse, aligning with principles of good governance (Krause, 2015).

References

Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D., Marlow, C., Settle, J. E., & Fowler, J. H. (2012). A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, 489(7415), 295–298. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11421

PSY FPX 5120 Assessment 1 Participating in Politics: Executive Summary

Capella University. (n.d.). Retrieved June 13, 2022, from https://courseroomc.capella.edu/ bbcswebdav/institution/PSY-FPX/PSY-FPX5201/220100/Course_Files/cf_concept_paper_template.docx Krause, T. (2015). A natural experiment on media attention and public enterprise accountability. Public Organization Review, 15(2), 297-315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-014-0270-2 Ovitt, M. (2022). Enhancing Voting Integrity. Unpublished manuscript. Protess, D. L., & McCombs, M. (Eds.). (1991). Agenda setting: Readings on media, public opinion and policymaking. Communication textbook series. Hillsdale: Erlbaum

PSY FPX 5120 Assessment 1 Participating in Politics: Executive Summary

Smith, A. (2020, August 28). Cell phones, social media and campaign 2014. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. Retrieved June 14, 2022, from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2014/11/03/cellphones-social-media-and-campaign-2014/

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS – PSY FPX 5120 Assessment 1 Participating in Politics: Executive Summary

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – PSY FPX 5120 Assessment 1 Participating in Politics: Executive Summary

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. PSY FPX 5120 Assessment 1 Participating in Politics: Executive Summary

• Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

• Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. PSY FPX 5120 Assessment 1 Participating in Politics: Executive Summary

• APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

• Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

• LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

• Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

• Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper